(Note: This is a modified
version of “Paper Portfolio” being developed by Dr. Jacob Held of the UCA
Philosophy and Religion Department. Feel free to provide me with feedback
regarding what is or isn’t working, possible modifications, etc. Ron Novy)
Metaphysics Paper Portfolio
Introduction:
Why a portfolio?
The value of writing a sustained research paper
is not to be found in the final product, but the process through which one goes
in crafting the paper, from conception to completion. This portfolio project
has been developed as a way of tracking and evaluating a student’s progress
through the course of a sustained research project.
Your portfolio will be comprised of five distinct
parts each worth a portion of the portfolio’s final grade. Each portion will be
due at an assigned date. Please review the guidelines so you are not caught off
guard.
The paper produced by this process will be about
10 pages in length (roughly 2500 words) and should be of a quality appropriate
for presentation at an undergraduate philosophy conference.
Elements
of the Portfolio:
Bibliography/Abstract 10%
Review
of Sources 20%
Initial
Draft & Comments 30%
Revised
Draft 20%
Full
Portfolio 20%
Schedule:
Feb.
8th: Choose Topic
Feb.
18th: Bibliography and Abstract
March
7: Review of Sources
March
21: Initial Draft
March
31: Comments Due
April
11: Revised Draft
April
23: Full Portfolio
Choosing
a Topic:
There are eleven general topic areas
(conveniently corresponding to
Students must indicate to me in writing which
topic area they have chosen no later February 8th. Once the topic is
chosen it cannot be changed.
Bibliography/Abstract:
By February 18th, I will require that
each student to turn in a bibliography and abstract. This is a working
bibliography listing which works you have looked at, are looking at, or are
planning on looking at. This bibliography must include at least three sources
external to the course and separate from those sources drawn from the lists in
Review
of Sources:
Over the course of researching the paper you will
inevitably read a book or several journal articles on your topic. In fact, the
bibliography guarantees that you will. No later than March 7th, you
will turn in a brief review of some of the materials you have read.
Chose either a major book you have read on the
topic or three journal articles related to the topic and write a 3-4 page
review of the material. Assess them with respect to merit. Do they speak to the
issue you are addressing? How do they do so? What in the works did you find
important/negligible? How do you see them promoting your research project? The
review should assess the works for how they address the topic and how you
envision them fitting into your overall program.
Show me that you have been doing research and
that you understand how the research you are doing is relevant to the
completion of your chosen project.
Initial
Draft and Comments:
Submitting a draft of work in progress for
comment provides the author with important feedback on her project. Your
initial draft is due no later than March 21st (the last day before
Spring Holiday). The paper at this stage is in draft form, and not expected to
be a completed paper. Nonetheless, it should be substantial (at least 5
coherent pages including: a thesis, basic argumentation/research and reference
to secondary sources).
The student will provide two copies of the draft:
one to be read by the professor, the other by a randomly-selected member of the
class. Both the professor and the student-reader will provide a critical review
of the paper.
Student-readers are to write a 2-3 page critique
of the draft received. This critique should focus on how successfully the
material fulfills the thesis as well as recommending changes and providing
suggestions in this regard. The student-reader will provide two copies of her
critique: one for the professor, the other for the author of the draft.
The student’s draft and her critique will count
equally toward the grade for this portion of the portfolio. The critique is due
no later than March 31st (the first class day following Spring
Holiday).
Revised
Draft:
No later than April 11th, students
will have submitted their papers. This paper should reflect corrections made in
light of the comments provided by both the professor and the student-reader.
This paper should be complete or nearly so at this point. Minimally, it should
consist of at least 80% of the length of the final paper complete with all
relevant sources, full citations and proper formatting. Short of minor
revisions and emendations, this should be the final paper.
The grade for this portion of the portfolio will
be based entirely on how close to a finished paper this revised draft appears
to be. Has it been revised since the tutorial in a meaningful way? Is it almost
a finished paper?
Full
Portfolio:
On the final regular class meeting – April 23rd
– students will submit their completed portfolio, preferably in a folder or
some other organized fashion.
The full portfolio will consist of: the final
version of the paper as well as all the draft work (your bibliography and
abstract, your review of sources, your initial draft with comments from both
the student-reader and the professor, and the revised draft).
Each part must be present in order to receive
full credit for this portion of your portfolio grade. This grade will be
determined primarily by the quality of the final paper, although failing to
provide the draft work will significantly impact your grade.