Research Methods Laboratory
Lammers' Writing Tips for the Discussion Section
Discussion
If the experiment is a simple one with
few findings reported in the Results section, you can begin the discussion
with a clear, unambiguous statement of the contribution that your study makes.
If a question was raised or a hypothesis stated, you should make a direct
statement concerning an answer to the question or whether the hypothesis was
or was not supported. When the Results section consists of many findings, it is
appropriate to open the discussion with a brief summary of your findings.
The important points brought out in the
introduction should be addressed in your Discussion. Also the major findings of
your study should be evaluated and interpreted. In this section you describe the
relationship of your findings to those of others and identify existing
similarities and differences. You may want to emphasize some of your findings
while qualifying others. Indicate whether your procedure, subject population, or
experimental manipulations restrict or limit the generalizations that can be
drawn. Theoretical speculation closely related to your data is appropriate in
this section. However, avoid rambling ideas and speculation distant from your
data. The practical implications of your data, if any, should be noted here.
If you feel that your study has some unusual strengths, then it is appropriate
to note them. Also, weaknesses, if any, should be briefly identified with
suggestions to correct them. You may want to conclude your discussion by
pointing to future research. The insight derived from your study may suggest
additional research or even a different direction that should be undertaken.